Rwandan Genocide: Atheism and the Problem of Good

In 1994, the outlandish of Rwanda experienced one of the worlds superior tragedies since the Holocaust. Rwanda became infamous for one of the immediate and most systematic genocides in human history; every told after the world as a whole (through the UN) had vowed to staunch much(prenominal) bloodshed from ever so happening again. Following the blinking(a) death of a president, the stallion country was sent into chaos, and in the course of solo hundred days, 800,000 people were killed. Of these, nearly all were from one of three heathen  separates native to Rwanda; the Tutsi. In organic, or so 80 percent of the total Tutsi population was eradicated in the genocide, along with a small scrap of the absolute volume Hutu racial group that sympathized with those being slaughtered. How can such an organized, systematic mass discharge be explained? The answer is non a simple one, and some(prenominal) different diachronic and policy-making factors actually led to Rw andas ultimate degeneration into being clinically dead as a nation. [1] The base policy-making campaign of this disaster was a long-running contestation betwixt the Tutsi (who were in power for centuries), and the majority Hutu peoples, who came to power in the sedition of 1959 -1962.\nBut how and why did this competition even start? Its origins ar complicated by issues tone ending back as far as the German colonization of the region in 1894, which served to cause a major stock split throughout the country. The aftermath of this rent went on to be intensify by numerous prox events which brought the entire population to the break point not only once, but twice in the erstwhile(prenominal) 60 years. callable to the genocides roots in political history, it is explainable through human, finite reasons such as the reciprocal atheist viewpoints regarding the Problem of Good. In fact, some atheist righteous theories do appear in the framework of Rwandas colonial and post-c olonial historical events, though the vast majority of them seem to have debatable validity at best. By looking at the past co...